ABOUT LEXICAL RELATIONS INSIDE THE SEMANTIC FIELD OF FAUNA


  • O.L. Lyapicheva Prydniprovska state academy of civil engineering and architecture, Ukraine
  • V.V. Zadunay Prydniprovska state academy of civil engineering and architecture, Ukraine
Keywords: zoosemism, semantic field, conceptosphere, hierarchical relations of words, domain, subdomain, conceptual metaphor, concept.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe zoosemisms and their concepts related to animal actions and actions performed on animals using frame analysis (in the form of a hierarchy of domains, subdomains, conceptual metaphors and concepts). The object of research in the article is the internal organization of the semantic field "fauna". The subject of analysis was the zoosemism of the Russian language. The relevance of the research is determined by the fact that the description of the semantic fields, which for a long time was the object of close attention of scientists, was conducted within the framework of the system-structural paradigm, when in the basis of the semantic relations of words scientists saw the relations of the hierarchy of the family. However, new approaches, in particular cognitive ones, require revision of previous views. In the basis of the relations of the words of the semantic field "Fauna" we lay the universal relations of human consciousness: subject, actional, possessive, identification, comparative, proposed in the works of SA. Zhabotinskaya.

The article deals with the internal structure of that part of the semantic field (SF) "Fauna", which consists of zoosemisms, including the semantic element "action" in its lexical meaning. This segment of the SF "Fauna" covers the segment of the corresponding conceptosphere (ACTIONAL  frame) with its domains and subdomains, conceptual metaphors and concepts. We see the prospect of further research in improving the technique of frame analysis, as well as in applying it to the description of new semantic fields.

Author Biographies

O.L. Lyapicheva, Prydniprovska state academy of civil engineering and architecture, Ukraine

сandidate of Science (Philology), associate professor

V.V. Zadunay, Prydniprovska state academy of civil engineering and architecture, Ukraine

lecturer

References

Адаменко П. А. Лексико-семантическая группа слов, обозначающих сельскохозяйственных животных (на материале английского языка): дис. …канд. филол. наук; 10.02.04 – германские языки. Л., 1971. 26 с.
2. Герд А. С. Проблемы формирования научной терминологии (на материале русских научных названий рыб) : автореф. дис. на соискание уч. степени докт. филол. наук: 10.02.01 «Русский язык» /А. С. Герд. – Л. 1967. 27 с.
3. Козлова Т. В. Идеографический словарь русских фразеологизмов с названиями животных. М. : Изд-во «Дело и Сервис». 2001. 208 с.
4. Жаботинская С. А. Концептуальный анализ : Типы фреймов / Вісник Черкаського університету. 1999. Вип. 11. С. 3–20.
5. Жаботинская С. А. Концептуальный анализ языка : фреймовые сети / Мова. Науково-теоретичний часопис з мовознавства. Проблеми прикладної лінгвістики. Одесса : Астропринт, 2004. № 9. С. 81–92.
6. Кубрякова Е. С., Демьянков В. З., Панкрац Ю. Г., Лузгина Л. Г. Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов [под общ. ред. Е. С. Кубряковой]. М. : МГУ. 1996. 245 с.
7. Кубрякова Е. С. Когнитивная лингвистика и проблемы композиционной семантики / Известия АН.2002. № 1. С. 13–24. (Серия литературы и языка, т. 61).
8. Кубрякова Е. С. Семантика в когнитивной лингвистике (О концепте контейнера и формах его объективации в языке)/ Известия РАН. 1999. № 5–6. С. 3–6. (Серия литературы и языка).
9. Кубрякова Е. С. Типы языковых значений: Семантика производного слова. М. : Наука. 1981. 200 с.
Published
2018-04-04
How to Cite
Lyapicheva, O., & Zadunay, V. (2018). ABOUT LEXICAL RELATIONS INSIDE THE SEMANTIC FIELD OF FAUNA. Linguistics. Lingvoculturology, 12(1), 151-162. Retrieved from https://lingvodnu.com/index.php/journal/article/view/83